Before you sign, verify the entity exists.
AI-generated shell companies are entering M&A pipelines, partnership agreements, and vendor contracts. Fabricated board members pass standard background checks. Manufactured credentials survive traditional legal due diligence. Your counterparties may not be real.
Legal Exposure to Synthetic Entities.
Counterparty Risk
M&A Fraud
Synthetic target companies are entering acquisition pipelines with fabricated revenue histories, manufactured executive teams, and AI-generated customer testimonials. A single undetected shell entity in your M&A pipeline exposes your client to fraudulent transfer, breach of fiduciary duty claims, and regulatory scrutiny.
Counterparty Risk
Partnership and vendor agreements require verification that the counterparty is a legitimate operating entity. Traditional checks verify registration and insurance. They do not verify that the executives are real, the credentials are earned, or the operational history is genuine. Synthetic entities exploit this structural gap.
Regulatory Liability
When a synthetic entity is discovered post-transaction, the legal exposure cascades: breach of representations and warranties, failure of due diligence obligations, potential securities violations, and fiduciary breach claims. The cost of detection before signing is a fraction of the cost of discovery after. Current KYB and AML frameworks were not designed to detect AI-generated entities—leaving a gap that regulators are beginning to notice.
What You Get
Rigorous entity verification backed by 20 peer-reviewed publications, delivered as board-ready documentation.
Entity Verification Report
Comprehensive analysis of counterparty legitimacy across 13+ verification signals. Each entity receives a synthetic probability score with full signal decomposition—domain provenance, executive identity consistency, content generation artifacts, network isolation, temporal clustering, and more.
Executive Summary for Board
Board-ready executive summary translating technical findings into business risk language. Risk classification for each entity assessed, recommended actions, and a clear go/no-go framework for transaction decisions. Designed for presentation to boards, investment committees, and regulatory bodies.
PE Firm Detects Synthetic Target Company Pre-Acquisition
A mid-market private equity firm engaged our verification assessment during due diligence on a SaaS acquisition target valued at $12M. Standard legal DD had cleared the entity—registration was valid, financials were audited, and references checked out. Our 13-signal analysis flagged the target with a synthetic probability score of 0.82. Key findings: the CTO's publication history contained AI-generated content with temporal clustering anomalies, 4 of 7 customer testimonials traced to domains registered within the same 30-day window, and the company's technical blog showed linguistic fingerprints consistent with a single LLM source. The firm walked away from the deal.
Probability
Protected
Signals Found
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the evidentiary basis for your methodology?
Our detection methodology is documented across 20 peer-reviewed publications hosted on Zenodo with permanent DOIs. Key papers include "The Structural Credibility Gap" (constructive proof of synthetic authority), "Full-Spectrum Synthetic Organizations" (taxonomy of fabrication techniques), and "Entity-Level Deepfakes and Intellectual Provenance" (detection framework). Every finding in our reports cites the specific methodology and signal analysis that produced it. This documentation is designed to withstand legal scrutiny and regulatory review.
How quickly can you assess a counterparty before a signing deadline?
A single-entity attack surface report starts at $500 and can be delivered within 5 business days. For larger assessments covering multiple entities in an M&A pipeline or vendor portfolio, the typical timeline is 3–6 weeks depending on scope. We offer expedited timelines for time-sensitive transactions. All assessments include an executive summary suitable for board presentation.
Does this replace our existing due diligence process?
No. Entity verification sits upstream of traditional legal due diligence. Your existing process verifies that a company is compliant, insured, and operationally sound. Our assessment verifies that the company itself—its executives, credentials, and operational history—is genuine. Think of it as a structural integrity check before you invest in the building inspection. The two processes are complementary.
Verify Before You Sign.
Your due diligence framework was designed for a world where entities were hard to fabricate. That world no longer exists. Add entity verification to your process before the next transaction closes.